Skip to content
  • Twitter
  • Editing
  • Other interests
  • Outreach
  • Podcasting
  • Science and Disability Reading Group
  • Writing
  • About
  • Contact

Osnat Katz Moon

Space historian | writer | editor

Written by Osnat KatzOctober 4, 2019

On writing popularly, and writing for children, and sometimes both

Not so long ago, I came across a comment suggesting that writing for “the general public” (I have issues with this term, but they’ll wait for another time) is a little bit like writing for children. The implication, I think, is that nonspecialists are ignorant, have short attention spans and will not understand or appreciate complex narratives.

I do not have children of my own, and for the moment (I am far too young) I do not want any. But I’ve done outreach with children and run workshops for young people and watched my niblings grow up into wonderful, vibrant humans who deserve the world.

Engaging children with science is, quite simply, some of the most challenging and worthwhile science communication I’ve ever done.

Children are fearsomely smart. Unlike adults, they are usually not afraid to admit they don’t know something (and to ask questions that will make you rack your brains). They pick up on everything you say and do, and they will learn from your example – though maybe not in the ways you thought they would. They’re also a picky audience – I might give the same explanation to a 20-year-old and a 21-year-old and have them both go away satisfied. The way I engage with an 11-year-old might be completely different from the way I engage with a 12-year-old (though both of them might bristle at being called “children” anyway). And unlike adults, who have (mostly) learned to smile and nod blankly even when they’re bored out of their minds, children will let you know when your engagement isn’t working for them. Which might be fairly frequently, because they’re intelligent and picky and hate anything that looks like condescension.

If writing for nonspecialists is anything like writing for children, it’s because people outside your field are always smarter than they look, will notice you patronising them, and demand that you bring your best public engagement to the table.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Opinion.Tagged public engagement, rant, science communication.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Blog Posts

  • August 2022 (1)
  • July 2022 (2)
  • December 2021 (2)
  • June 2021 (1)
  • May 2021 (1)
  • March 2021 (1)
  • August 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (2)
  • October 2019 (2)
  • March 2019 (2)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • August 2018 (1)
  • July 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • January 2018 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (1)

Post navigation

Previous Post Passing on wisdom: from those who have left physics
Next Post Views from above and epistemic injustice
Website Powered by WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Osnat Katz Moon
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Osnat Katz Moon
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: